Supreme Court's AI Copyright Ruling: What 'Significant Human Input' Actually Means
The Supreme Court ruled this week on the question every AI artist has been asking: Can AI-generated art be copyrighted?
The answer: Yes, but only if there’s “significant human creative input.”
Which raises the obvious question: What counts as “significant”?
The Case That Got Here
The lawsuit involved an artist who used Midjourney to generate a series of images, then edited them extensively in Photoshop. She registered the final works with the Copyright Office. They said no. She sued. She won. The publisher appealed. And now the Supreme Court has spoken.